Showing posts with label meetings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meetings. Show all posts

Tuesday, 3 March 2009

Meetings is murder

"But this new energy is being channelled by organisers into boring meetings which reproduce the hierarchy of mass society. After a while, critical thinking is eroded and people lose their curiosity. Meetings become a routine like everything else in life.

A lot of problems which collectives will have can be traced to the work habits acquired in the (mass) movement. People perpetuate the passive roles they have become accustomed to in large meetings. The emphasis on mass participation means that all you have to do is show up. Rarely, do people prepare themselves for a meeting, nor do they feel the need to. Often this situation does not become evident precisely because the few people who do work (those who run the meeting) create the illusion of group achievement.

Because people see themselves essentially as objects and not as subjects, political activity is defined as an event outside them and in the future. No one sees themselves making the revolution and, therefore, they don't understand how it will be accomplished."

From "Anti-Mass Methods of organisation for collectives"

Sigh. We will only ever "learn" when the ego-needs of the organisers, the prattlers they invite to speak and the half-in-love-with-spectating "participants" are no longer being met.

On the other side of the fucking apocalypse.

Saturday, 28 February 2009

Open and Shut up case...

After the Convention of Modern Liberty debacle, I stomped off to my "local Wetherspoon's" (I'm aware of the contradiction, but the only 'greasy spoon' cafe nearby is awful) for a veggie breakfast.

Bumped into a guy I know tangentially, and although the conversation started off amicably enough, it soon spiralled out of control. I bear at least 50% of the blame for that, and really should grow up. Sigh. I think the button that was pushed (and again, I bear the blame here- I should be in better control of my buttons) was the resigned assumption that numbers attending a campaigning group's meetings must necessarily shrink with time.

WTF? Since when was it acceptable to accept that campaigns will go up like a rocket and down like a stick? Why aren't we moving heaven and earth to figure out how to do things better? Why aren't we doing sensible soul-searching about the reasons newbies don't stick around, why other people never quite set foot through the door, why the 'core group' is core, and stays core? Why aren't we highlighting the dangers of burnout and cliquyness in core groups?
Are we doing all this activism tosh this for social reasons, or are we doing it because we genuinely want to achieve our goals?? Huh??

So it all came down to a tedious semantic battle on the meaning of "open". Open has many meeetings, but here it was put, bizarrely as a "contradiction" with 'fun'.

Sigh.

http://www.agileopen.net/on-open-space
is a good place to start.

Or here, here, here or here. Or here. Or here dammit.

Campaign Against Enduring Counter-productive and Useless Meetings is obviously going to have to be re-vivified...